Home News
News
SACTWU Spring Queen 2011 PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 07 November 2011 17:40

PRESS STATEMENT

 

The 35th Annual SACTWU Spring Queen will be taking place on Saturday 12 November 2011 at the Good Hope Centre in Cape Town. The event will see 47 women, all workers in the clothing, textile and leather sectors across the Western Cape, participating and hoping to be crowned the Sactwu Spring Queen for 2011.

The Spring Queen is one of Cape Town’s biggest events, with the Good Hope Centre filled to capacity with workers celebrating the evening with banners and T-shirts emblazoned with their factory names.

The annual event is the largest fashion show featuring workers as models. It is a fun and important occasion as the focus is on ordinary workers which provide a face to the garments, shoes and fabrics that are sold in retail stores and boutiques across South Africa.

Local Talent such as The Boys and Vibe will entertain the crowd with their performances. Also on the programme this year, SACTWU introduces the SACTWU Got Talent finalists. Four workers from factories will compete for the inaugural SACTWU’s Got Talent title.

The programme starts at 19:00 for 19:30.

Members of the press who would like to attend can contact Nazmia Leite on This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or 072 198 6061 for registration. Media Registration will take place on 11th November 2011 on the 3rd Floor, 350 Industria House Victoria Road.

For comment contact Fachmy Abrahams on 021 447 4570 or 082 5222 386

 
SACTWU secures legal standing in Canyon Springs 417/418 enquiries PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 26 September 2011 16:50

PRESS STATEMENT:


The Southern African Clothing and Textile Workers’ union (SACTWU) has secured the legal  right to participate in a section 417/418 Companies’ Act enquiry, in the Canyon Springs liquidation proceedings. It will be the first ever such enquiry in South Africa in which a trade union participates, by way of interrogating witnesses who have been subpoenaed to attend the enquiry, and will usher in a new era in industrial relations in our country, where bosses and related persons of suspect  insolvent companies are called to account for their actions in  a legally sanctioned investigation enquiry. In this instance, SACTWU is pursuing the Section 417/418 enquiry in order to establish what has happened to about R100m of its members’ retirement funds, loaned to Canyon Springs by the Trilinear Empowerment Trust (TET),  to recover as much as possible of the missing monies and to ensure that if any guilt is proven by anyone, steps are taken to bring the guilty to book.

The new Companies’ Act, which provides for this type of enquiry, came into effect in May  this year. SACTWU has purchased the debtors’ rights of Dart Stationers CC to secure the legal standing to pursue the enquiry (this debtors’ purchase was done for a minimal amount of just over R900, being the amount that Canyon Springs owes Dart Stationers for stationary purchases). The agreement with the union states that Darts Stationers CC cedes its Canyon Springs debtor’s rights to SACTWU. A second similar agreement was entered into with Mel Solving IT CC, for just over R400. Prior to these two agreements, SACTWU had no legal standing in the matter, as the union itself was never party to the investment decisions of the retirement funds or in any of the decisions by the Trilinear Empowerment Trust Fund to lend retirement fund monies to Canyon Springs. These agreements now provide the union with the legal right to pursue a section 417/418 enquiry against anyone involved in the alleged misappropriation of about R100 million of SACTWU members’ retirement funds originally loaned to Canyon Springs. 

The union has arranged for the Section 417/418 enquiry to commence at the end of September this year and it is expected to run for about  10 non-consecutive days, with completion  expected by mid-October 2011. There-after, the Enquiry Commissioner is required by law to prepare and issue a report, including to pronounce on alleged criminal and/or negligent conduct by persons who have been subpoenaed to appear. The Cape High Court has now already appointed senior attorney Jan Reitz as the Enquiry Commissioner.

In terms of the new Companies Act, a subpoenaed person is required to answer all questions at the 417/418 enquiry and to produce such documents as may be required, failing which the person could be jailed.

We are determined to execute my take steps to of recover every single cent which may be missing and to ensure that if any wrongdoing is proven, the guilty must go to jail for a long time.

SACTWU has instructed that a number of high profile people involved in  the matter to be subpoenaed and the Enquiry Commissioner has now formally issued such subpoenas. Persons who have been summoned to date are as follows (more persons WILL be summonsed later):

•     Mohan Patel.  He is one of the key directors of Canyon Springs and is effectively one of the senior shareholders of Canyon Springs. He has acted as the equivalent of  Canyon Springs CEO for many years.

•     Enoch Godongwana.  He was a director of Canyon Springs.  When he became a Deputy Minister, he resigned as a director and his wife, Thandiwe Godongwana, then became a director of Canyon Springs.  Furthermore, him and his wife are, through their company, effectively senior shareholders in Canyon Springs.

•     Thandiwe Godongwana.  As stated above, she is a director of Canyon Springs and through the relevant company effectively a senior shareholder of Canyon Springs.

•     Erwin Da Gama.  Is a director of Leading Prospects (Pty) Limited (“Leading Prospects”), which company was allegedly granted an unsecured loan of at least R15 million by Canyon Springs.

•     Sam Buthelezi.  He is effectively the Chairman of and the person in control of all of the Trilinear companies, which were effectively the financial services provider and investment advisers for  the Trilinear Empowerment Trust (“TET”). 

•     Graig Philander.  He was one of the initial trustees of TET.  He was apparently paid a substantial consultancy fee, as a consultant for TET. 

•     Richard Kawie.  He claims that he was the National Benefits Co-ordinator of SACTWU and it is alleged that he has received substantial service fee payments from Canyon Springs, up to approximately R8m. In meetings with the trade union, he has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

•     Hyman Bruk of Bruk Munkes & Co, the auditors of Canyon Springs. 

•     Bonita Davids.  She was the bookkeeper for Canyon Springs.

•     PKF, the auditors of TET.  PKF recently withdrew the audited financial statements of TET for several years, because they alleged there have been misrepresentations made to them, after the union had queried certain aspects of their reports

•     Shahid Sulaiman.  He is a partner at Bowman Gilfillan, one of the top legal firms in South Africa, the attorneys that acted for the Trilinear companies and TET.  It is alleged that he made material written misrepresentations relating to the financial position of TET/Trilinear, allegedly also having given written assurances that the monies are secure in safety deposits.

•    Silumko Nondwangu, a former General Secretary of the National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA), who is alleged to have received payments from Canyons Springs for services which he claims to have legitimately rendered to the company

•    Spencer Witten: Richard Kawie’s PA

•     Siphamandla Jama.  He was originally employed with the Trilinear companies, as well as TET, and signed the founding affidavit in support of TET’s application for the liquidation of Canyon Springs.

•  Darawees Gasant: he acted as a Transaction Adviser to Canyon Springs

The following persons will appear  first during the commencing session this week,  and in this order, when the Enquiry starts on 29 September 2011:

•     Enoch Godongwana.

•     Thandiwe Godongwana.

•     Siphamandla Jama

•     Mohan Patel.

 

Issued by
Andre Kriel
SACTWU
General Secretary

 

 
PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 08 August 2011 00:00

NATIONAL WOMEN'S MONTH


The month of August is known as women’s month.  Women’s Day is held on the 9th of August and is celebrated to honour the bravery of the women who marched to the Union buildings on the 9th of August 1956, to protest against the hated pass laws imposed on them during Apartheid. SACTWU thanks and pays tribute to these women, and all other women who have paved the way for our future women leaders


 
PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 01 August 2011 00:00

‘Walmart effect’ on Mexico shows the true price of bargains

Etienne Vlok and Simon Eppel   August 2, 2011


In 2004 the Mexican Federal Competition Commission took the extraordinary step of allowing collusion in the Mexican retail market when it approved the establishment of Sinergia, a buying co-operative comprised of Mexico’s second-, third- and fourth-largest retailers.

Why would a regulator that serves to defend competition endorse anti-competitive behaviour? Simple: Walmart. For Walmart is the undisputed leader in the Mexican retail sector and the commission was trying to correct massive distortions of power between Walmart and its competitors, particularly around pricing.

As the New York Times noted at the time, “the joint purchasing company (Sinergia) is an attempt to match Walmart’s influence over suppliers”.

During South Africa’s Competition Tribunal hearings into the Walmart-Massmart merger, Walmart dismissed concerns about the company’s effect on local competition and employment by referring to its alleged effect in Chile, where it has been operating since 2009. However, fundamental flaws were identified with the Chilean example. We believe a much better indicator of the likely medium- to long-term effect of the company on South Africa can be found with Walmart’s experiences in Mexico.

Walmart entered Mexico in 1991 when it purchased a local retailer, Cifra. For the first few years of its presence, Walmex – as the company is known in Mexico – grew slowly. However, since 2005 when the company had only 488 stores, Walmex has seen spectacular growth, reaching a total of 1 364 stores by December 2010. In comparison its nearest competitor, Soriana, had just 508 stores, and a further 300 convenience stores – many of which are franchises.

Even with the buying co-operative, Walmex’s competitors cannot keep up. Walmart’s financial and buying power are simply too great. The company has invested the equivalent of R8 billion in its Mexican operations in 2011 alone, a trifling amount for a colossus like Walmart – whose sales in 2010 were more than R2.8 trillion. This is difficult for Soriana to match, with sales of only R55bn in 2010 (and would be similarly difficult for South African retailers, whose market leader, Shoprite, had sales of R67bn in 2010). Walmart’s unparalleled financial clout means it is peerless in its power to invest in its operations and grow vis--vis its competitors.

What of the effect of Walmart’s pursuit of its low-price strategy? French economist Cedric Durand has linked Walmex to a dramatic increase in imported goods into Mexico in an article published in the Cambridge Journal of Economics:
“After 1997, we observe a faster increase in Walmart’s imports in real terms compared with its competitors’. If we look at the imports-to-purchases ratio, we see that all the enterprises have been significantly increasing the share of imports in their purchases, but also that Walmart has shown a much more dramatic evolution: from 20 percent in 1997 to more than 55 percent in 2002 and 2003.”

Walmart’s pursuit of low prices significantly affected the total levels of imports into Mexico. In this, Durand’s findings echo similar conclusions by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which analysed Walmart’s effects on imports and jobs in the US. It concluded that Walmart’s imports alone were responsible for destroying 200 000 jobs – including 130 000 manufacturing jobs – between 2001 and 2006. The destruction of manufacturing jobs is significant: a strong manufacturing industry is a key driver of development.

That Walmart’s massive bargaining power and its importation practices lead to increased job losses is borne out by the Mexican evidence. For instance, Walmart expert and professor at the University of California, Nelson Lichtenstein, has said: “Walmex has had a devastating impact on Mexican manufacturing. Although Wal-mart initially claimed that it would incorporate local Mexican firms into its supply chain, the famous squeeze on profits and labour never let up.”

He quoted an executive of a small clothing manufacturer as saying: “Walmart has driven many suppliers out of business. Walmart maintains its profit margins… They never reduce their margin. They do pass on savings in price, but at the expense of the manufacturer. You can increase efficiency a certain amount, but… for example, they may tell you, ‘We’re going to sell shirts at a 40 percent discount – you, the manufacturer have to cut your price 40 percent.’ So the consumer benefits, but they’re driving out of business the manufacturers that provide jobs.”

Even when Walmex purchases goods locally, it squeezes manufacturers to continuously reduce costs. This usually ends in manufacturers having to import the goods they supply, as they cannot manufacture at such low prices, legally anyhow.

Clothing makers and workers have not been the only casualties of Walmex. Many other sectors have been affected. For instance, while productivity has increased within the soaps, detergents and surfactants industry in Mexico, employment in that industry has decreased by about 20 percent, largely as a result of Walmart.

So, what does Mexico have to teach South Africa about Walmart?

First, the financial power of Walmart is likely to benefit Massmart in South Africa, with significant effects on competition. Massmart will be leveraged into a position of market dominance (both within and beyond the liquor, building material and general merchandise markets where it currently leads) by virtue of Walmart’s unmatched financial power. Concentration and consolidation of the retail industry will occur and barriers to entry for new and smaller competitors will rise.

Second, Walmart is likely to increase the scale of problems facing South Africa, including job losses, unemployment and deindustrialisation. As Durand has shown for Mexico, competitor retailers will mimic Walmart’s practices (the Walmart effect) to better compete with the company. Greater imports will occur as competitors seek the cheapest prices.

In instances where local procurement initially occurs, Walmart and its South African competitors will squeeze local manufacturers even further than they already are squeezed causing many local companies to restructure or fold. Jobs will be lost (both among local manufacturers and among retailers who will struggle to match Walmart’s prices and their growth), offsetting any jobs that Walmart creates.

The possibility of lower prices from Walmart may be attractive, but at what cost? Low prices cannot come at the expense of local manufacturing and retail jobs and increased concentration in the retail sector, among others.

Mexico’s experience of Walmart shows that the company poses real challenges to South Africa, particularly in key socio-economic matters. We should tread with great, great care.

Etienne Vlok and Simon Eppel work for the SA Labour Research Institute, the research arm of the Southern African Clothing and Textile Workers Union.
 

 
«StartPrev1112131415NextEnd»

Page 12 of 15